Toshiko Ishibashi

Building Mutual Understanding Between Scientists and Study Coordinators to Address the CRC Workforce Crisis

If one takes the view that the tenets of patient centricity in healthcare include supporting not only patients but also the people who stand closest to them, then supporting the clinical research coordinators (CRCs) who have the most patient-facing role in clinical trials should be a critical focus, according to the creator of an award-winning poster presented earlier this year at ACRP 2026 in Orlando.

Better Together: Can Sites, Sponsors, and CROs Have a Kumbaya Moment?

No one is saying that clinical trial sites, sponsors, and contract research organizations (CROs) can’t symbolically gather 'round the campfire and get along with one another. In fact, they can and must, if the clinical research enterprise is to keep running on all cylinders. So it is that, in the forthcoming August issue of Clinical Researcher, we consider the theme of “Better Together: Getting Sites, Sponsors, and CROs All on the Same Page” by way of a variety of contributors who address the nuances of these potentially rewarding and potentially fraught ties between research partners.

A Visit with the Africa Clinical Research Network

Some parts of the world get much more attention for it than others, but the professionals of the clinical research enterprise are active all over the globe, often through multinational efforts requiring careful coordination and regulatory finesse. In this blog, ACRP is pleased to have Tariro Makadzange, MD, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of the Africa Clinical Research Network, share some details on the network's mission and activities.

To be Labeled a Success, eConsent Must Deliver on Promises for Participants, Sites, and Sponsors

The value of deploying electronic informed consent (eConsent) technology is widely considered in terms of the comprehension, satisfaction, and retention of the clinical trial participants for whom consent documentation is a critical window on the complexities of trial-related processes and expectations. However, the authors of a forthcoming pair of ACRP Clinical Researcher articles whose lessons will be explored an ACRP Webinar this month say that a broader assessment of eConsent’s real-world impact is vital to ensuring that it delivers on its full promises for study sites and sponsors in addition to the participants signing the informed consent form’s bottom line.