When a clinical trial site receives a Clinical Trial Agreement or Master Services Agreement from a sponsor, most of the negotiating energy goes to the budget, the payment schedule, and the operational terms. The insurance and indemnification sections tend to get a quick read and a signature. This article explains why those sections deserve more attention, walks through the provisions sites will most commonly encounter, and offers a set of practical questions site leaders can raise internally or with their legal counsel and insurance advisors before an agreement is executed.
For years, the conversation about accelerating drug development has focused on scientific discovery: better target identification, faster molecule design, stronger predictive models, and, more recently, the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI). AI investment is now beginning to change the front end of the pipeline. More candidates can now be identified, prioritized, and advanced with unprecedented speed in the preclinical space. But that progress has exposed a different constraint: how to evaluate these promising therapies as they transition into humans at a pace the current clinical development system can sustain.
Pediatric research is essential to improving child health worldwide. However, scientific, ethical, and infrastructural challenges serve as barriers to this essential research. International and national stakeholders have developed coordinated strategies to strengthen evidence generation, enhance safety assessments, and accelerate therapeutic discovery for children.
According to the authors of this Letter to the Editor, ensuring robust female representation in both clinical and observational studies is vital for producing generalizable findings and improving women’s health. Despite significant efforts to include women and minorities in clinical research, persistent gaps in participation still exist. A key challenge lies in balancing participation with safety measures designed to protect female participants, particularly those of childbearing potential, from the risks associated with certain inventions and/or exposures.
While risk-based quality management has gained increasing acceptance across the clinical research enterprise, quantitative evidence on its financial impact has been limited. A new analysis coauthored by experts from CluePoints and the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development addresses this gap.