“What Got Us Here, Won’t Get Us There,” and Other Insights on the Clinical Research Workforce Shared at ACRP 2026

Advocating for awareness of clinical research, with all of its possible career options, in public and policy-making circles is an often quiet but mighty endeavor, but one lately being taken on at ever greater volume by a variety of cheerleaders. Some of the most vocal boosters are part of ACRP’s Partners Advancing the Clinical Research Workforce, a multi-stakeholder collaborative of industry leaders who are committed to building a diverse, research-ready workforce for the enterprise and who met to present updates on their initiatives during ACRP 2026 in Orlando.

The Need for Clinical Research Sites to Transition to e-Regulatory Binders: Strategies, Pros, and Cons

Clinical research trials have long relied on paper regulatory binders to manage essential documents required by regulatory authorities, sponsors, and research teams. However, with the increasing complexity of clinical trials, the shift toward electronic regulatory (e-regulatory) binders has become essential to improve efficiency, compliance, and data management.

Measuring Quality in the Age of AI: Why Regulatory Writing Needs a True Standard

The use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in regulatory medical writing is expanding rapidly, yet the industry still lacks a standardized way to define and measure “quality.” Without measurable baselines, organizations cannot demonstrate whether AI-assisted drafts meet regulatory expectations or improve over time.This article outlines an emerging, multi-layered framework for evaluating AI-generated content in regulatory submissions.

Enhancing the Quality of Investigator-Initiated Trials Through Self-Study Modules

Investigator-initiated trials are essential for driving innovation and advancing clinical research. However, these studies often lack structured monitoring and quality oversight. While Good Clinical Practice trainings exist, many are too broad, costly, or inaccessible. To address this gap, the authors of this article developed the Clinical Trial Quality Training Series, three self-paced modules (Monitoring, Auditing, and Inspection Readiness) that are guided by an implementation science framework.

From Mapping Your Pathway to Traversing a Career

Building on earlier work, the authors of this article have taken a broader look at the clinical research profession to be more inclusive of the career opportunities found with pharmaceutical sponsors, contract research organizations, commercial institutional review boards, and technology solution vendors, redirecting their vision from the original “tube stop” concept to a new “Airport Concourse Model.”