Insights

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted nearly every facet of healthcare, and clinical research was no exception. Amid the challenges, one academic medical center demonstrated notable workforce stability. A recent study published in the Journal of Clinical and Translational Science offers a compelling look at how Duke University in North Carolina managed turnover and internal workforce movement—termed “turbulence”—among clinical research professionals from 2016 through 2024. 

Although the phenomenon of disgruntled employees “ghosting” (also known as “quiet quitting” or “slow quitting”) their workplaces is rife with financial and ethical impacts for the life cycle of clinical research studies, interdisciplinary solutions for detecting and correcting the behavior offer some peace of mind, according to the creators behind a poster that placed in the top three among those presented at ACRP 2025. 

Clinical trials are typically seen as engines of innovation, but for economically disadvantaged individuals, they can also be a gateway to care—particularly for chronic diseases that are expensive to manage. For those living with gastrointestinal (GI) conditions like ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), or NAFLD’s advanced form, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), clinical trials may offer access to diagnostics, treatments, and specialists that would otherwise be out of reach.